Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Dietary(Nutritional) recommendations for Hypothyroidism (Underactive Essay

Dietary(Nutritional) recommendations for Hypothyroidism (Underactive Thyroid Gland) - Essay Example Both deficiency and excess of iodine are bad. Excess intake in a patient with underlying thyroid disease can cause full-blown thyroid dysfunction. 1.1mg daily iodine intake is recommended (Leung cited in Ede 2012). Levothyroxine is a thyroid hormone synthetically manufactured. It is used in patients with hypothyroidism. But, food-drug interactions are very important here because certain foods can decrease its absorption in the biological system. Soy flour, calcium juices or supplements, and dietary fiber can decrease absorption of levothyroxine. So after taking this thyroid hormone, these foods should be avoided for several hours. But, fasting is prohibited because prolonged fasting state can drastically increase thyroid hormone levels (Wickham 2013). Levothyroxine can also impair absorption of hypoglycemic drugs, so blood glucose levels should be carefully monitored (NLM 2009). For hypothyroidism, iodine supplements are mostly unnecessary since the introduction of iodized salt and f ood fortification unless one is living in a poverty-stricken or severely underdeveloped region. Though iodine supplements may still be required in some cases, levothyroxine is usually considered sufficient for safe treatment of hypothyroidism (Nippoldt 2012). Messina, M & Redmond, G 2006, ‘Effects of soy protein and soybean isoflavones on thyroid function in healthy adults and hypothyroid patients: a review of the relevant literature’, Thyroid, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 249-58. Nippoldt, TB 2012, ‘Can iodine supplements help regulate thyroid function in a person with hypothyroidism?’, viewed 12 May 2014,

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Cosmetic Surgery for Cheekbones and Chin

Cosmetic Surgery for Cheekbones and Chin Significance of high cheekbones a prominent chin: Aesthetic point of view In the world of today, â€Å"selfie† has become kind of an obsession and being active on â€Å"social media† and showing off your so called â€Å"cool social life† has become an obligation! In such a world today, having been able to possess ‘attractive facial features’ is a must, be it men or women. It has been shown beyond doubt, that ‘facial symmetry’ is one of the benchmarks, by which attractiveness of a face can be recognized. However, there are found to be many other factors which are responsible for making a face look appealing. The face is the first thing that catches the attention of a passer by, friend or a foe. Who doesn’t want to look attractive? Nowadays, people use certain kind of beauty creams, wear makeup; so as to look appealing and presentable. In the world of today, your ‘persona’ with which you carry yourself, can get you brownie points in the field that you belong to! Having a good, magnificent and presentable personality is one of the most compelling things that can get you one step closer towards achieving recognition in your particular field. In order to look presentable, you ought to possess ‘attractive facial features’ as they say! Apart from these artificial beautifying measures such as beauty creams, makeup etc, there are some facial features that can make you look charismatic naturally. Having sharp facial features makes one look good and attractive. High cheekbones, wide-set eyes, a small nose and a prominent chin are believed to make one look appealing. Beauty does not have set parameters as such. It depends on how one perceives beauty. The Science of Attraction Researchers from a University at Sweden have propounded that our conclusions on whether we find someone charming may be as a result of hormones that we are exposed to in utero or at the time of puberty, our dependence on visual information, the way our brains advanced systems to identify/perceive/process different stimuli and/or our wish to transfer â€Å"attractive genes† to our progeny so that they might have higher chances of finding a mate and resultant reproductive conquest. As per an extensive research done by a University at Germany, the thing that everyone finds sexually appealing in the opposite sex is symmetry. This holds true for human as well as animal kingdoms. Faces having great degree of symmetry are classically believed to be more attractive and symmetry has been linked with good health and genetic quality. Distinct digressions from this mean are said to denote lack of general well-being or ill-health. It is of our good interest to mate with somebody with best possible genes. And this will in turn be transferred to our children, making certain that we have healthy kids, who will pass our own genes on for the generations to come. High cheekbones are the zygomatic bones in the face of primates, which in some people may be more notable than others, resulting in the upper part of the cheeks to protrude and form a line cut into the side of the face. High cheekbones, producing a symmetrical face contour, are quite common in fashion divas and is said to be a ‘beauty trait’. High cheekbones develop with age and denote that a woman is old enough to be able to reproduce. In case of males, prominent facial features like a strong jaw and chin, high cheekbones indicate high level of testosterone and are believed to be attractive physical characteristics in many cultures. Some fortunate people are naturally gifted with these attractive facial features while the others have to undergo certain procedures in order to be able to possess sharp facial features and look appealing. Let’s have a look at these varied treatments and procedures: Injectable Fillers: Filler injections are non surgical soft tissue fillers approved as medical devices by the Food Drug Administration (FDA). These are injected into the skin and help filling the lost volume of the skin. The most common areas that get exposed to these injections are the cheeks, cheekbones and chin. Hyaluronan (Hyaluronic acid) is the commonest constituent of an injectable filler. Juvederm Voluma: Juvederm Voluma with Lidocaine is the latest of the Juvederm range of injectable fillers produced by Allergan that is made up of hyaluronic acid gel and a naturally occurring substance in the skin. These are specially created to reinstate volume in the regions of volume loss. Also, due to its skillfulness it provides a definition to the jaw line as well. It restores deep volume loss and smoothes the mid-face. Revives sunken areas around the cheek region. Gives volume and a youthful contour/appearance to the chin. Juvederm Voluma can last up to 1 and a half year (18 months) which may vary from person to person. Individuals with facial volume loss as a result of ageing, sudden unexplained weight loss or certain problems like facial droop or asymmetry may assist from the treatment with Juvederm Voluma. Average length of filler injections is approximately 10 to 20 minutes per session, based on the individual and the amount being treated. These require minimal downtime, permitting patients to resume work and their normal activities directly following treatment. Cheek Chin Augmentation: Surgical Techniques Cheek implants or perhaps Cheek enlargement is a sort of plastic surgical treatment and that is accomplished as a way to highlight this cheeks while on an individual’s face. A plastic surgeon may perhaps place a great implant in the cheekbone for this purpose. These types of implants increase the projection in the cheekbones. Ripped or perhaps recessed cheek places may perhaps turn out seeking richer because of the added amount due to enlargement. Cheek Augmentation is mostly amalgamated using some other techniques including Face lift or perhaps face enlargement. Material used: Cheek implants may perhaps consist involving distinct sort of components. The most typical is solid silicone. Additionally, 2 additional options are generally high-density porous polyethylene, also known as Medpor, and ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), also called Gore-Tex. Shapes: Three different shapes: Malar – This kind of is probably the most common of them all. These types of implants are placed entirely on this cheek bone tissues. Due to that the cheeks become more prominent and â€Å"higher contour† sideways in the face. Submalar – These kind of implants usually are not intended to become positioned on this cheekbones. These are set up pertaining to supplementing this midface, especially when a person is having emaciated appearance or perhaps â€Å"skinny† physical appearance to this particular place. Combined – Extensive implants which might be useful for augmenting equally, this cheekbones plus the mid-face. Exactly how would be the Cheek Implants placed? An incision is made by a Facial Plastic surgeon inside upper oral cavity on the the top gum line and the implants are generally slid in the spot. Implants can be placed by means of doing the outside incision on the eye, but the drawback being, it could possibly build an apparent scar. Thats why majority of sufferers do not prefer this method. Although, this intra-oral (inside this mouth) technique will involve a much better danger involving contamination for the reason that oral cavity has a lot more number of microorganisms. Cheek implant surgical procedure is generally executed immediately after giving sedation or perhaps common anesthesia and it will take about one to two hrs. Patient generally recovers within 10 days. Chin Implants/ Chin Augmentation: Chin enlargement is performed with the help of Chin Implants. This is a sort of surgical treatment that may change/modify the basic structure in the face. This kind of change therefore allocates far better sense of balance to the facial features. This peculiar medical terminologies Genioplasty and Mentoplasty are used to indicate the addition and decrease in the material to a patients chin. This will lead to reduction in the chin height or chin rounding by osteotomy, or chin augmentation with the help of implants. This kind of surgical procedure is a lot of the times, executed before Rhinoplasty (Nose job), that assists in balancing the facial proportions. This process accentuates the real key characteristic in the lower part of the face by means of improving its shape, height, width and prominence. A lot of the sufferers are searching for addressing a poor or perhaps undefined chin which â€Å"blends into the neck† too much (microgenia). This can be of disquietude as it has more effect on the patient’s side profile which enables it to help to make this nose seem nastily larger and much more visible. As a issue involving simple fact, sufferers have seen the effective improvement in their facial outline from chin implants on your own, in lieu of considering a lot more complex course of action involving Rhinoplasty (Nose surgery). When we examine the patients face on the the front, aesthetic preferences will be determined by gender. A masculine chin is generally wider and square shaped, so that the face has resemblance to a rectangle or square. A feminine chin is mostly narrower, such that it bears resemblance with an inverted triangle. Chin enlargement is a relatively easy procedure for the affected individual while resulting in notable improvements in the delineation of the face. This sort of surgical procedure is mostly executed by the oral maxillofacial surgeon, plastic surgeon or perhaps otolaryngologist. What is the Procedure for placing Chin Implants? This surgical treatment can be executed in a surgeons clinic, a hospital, or perhaps the outpatient clinic. X-rays of the patient;s chin and face will likely be obtained. The doctor will certainly find out what part of the chin to operate upon, making use of these X-rays. If your implant is merely needed to round out the chin: The affected individual may be given general anesthesia (asleep and pain-free), or perhaps he/she may be provided with a medicine such that the place becomes numb, along with a medicine that will cause them to relaxed and sleepy. A cut is made, either inside the oral cavity or outside under the chin. And in front of the chin bone and beneath the muscles, a pocket is created. This implant is positioned inside. The cosmetic surgeon may perhaps use real bone tissue or perhaps fat tissue, or perhaps the implant made out of plastic, Teflon, Dacron, or perhaps newer biological inserts. The implant is generally affixed to the bone tissue using screws or perhaps sutures. Sutures are utilized for closing the wound. When the cut in inside the oral cavity, the scar is hardly visible. At times, there may often be the necessity to move few bony tissues: The course of action will likely be accomplished under general anesthesia. The cosmetic surgeon can make the incision inside the patient’s oral cavity along the lower gum. This provides entrance for the chin bone. Second incision through the jaw bone can be made if you use a chisel or a bone. This jaw bone is moved and wired or perhaps screwed in place. Closure of the incision is done using stitches and a bandage is applied. Because the surgical procedure is accomplished within the patient’s oral cavity, these scar problems won’t become apparent. The procedure will take around 1 to 3 hrs.

Friday, October 25, 2019

Edward Saids Orientalism Essay -- History Colonialism Orientalism Es

Edward Said's Orientalism Western civilization, generally speaking, is extremely egotistical and has the view that Western culture is superior to all others. They believe they are more civilized and more educated than the rest of the world and because of this, stems the idea that it is the duty of Western civilization to take other, less developed societies under their wing. These concepts of supremacy and domination are closely related to Said's ideas of Orientalism. In his book, Orientalism, Edward Said explains in detail exactly what he believes the word Orientalism means. He tries to prove his concepts through the words of statesmen, including Britain's Evelyn Baring Cromer. Cromer's words reflect the concepts introduced by Said. According to Said, one definition of Orientalism is that it is a "style of thought based upon an ontological and epistemological distinction made between 'the Orient' and the 'Occident'." This is connected to the idea that Western society, or Europe in this case, is superior in comparison to cultures that are non-European, or the Orient. This means that Orientalism is a kind of racism held toward anyone not European. Said wrote that Orientalism was "a Western style for dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the Orient." This Western idea of the Orient explains why so many European countries occupied lands they believed to be Oriental. This first concept of Orientalism is blatantly reflected in the words of Evelyn Baring Cromer. Cromer was England's representative in Egypt between 1882 and 1907. He believed in European supremacy and called Egyptians, and all other people he considered Oriental, subject races. He justified European occupation in Egypt with this idea of superio... ...e. This idea is shown through Cromer's words as well. Two quotes perfectly show what Said is trying to get across to the reader. Cromer states: I content myself with noting the fact that somehow or another the Oriental generally acts speaks and thinks in a matter exactly opposite to the European. From this quote he concludes: Europe is always in a position of strength, The Oriental is irrational, depraved, childlike, "different", thus the European is rational, virtuous, mature, "normal". Cromer believes that the Orient would be nothing without Western Civilization. He embodies everything Said means by the term Orientalism including having a superiority complex and over generalizing a large group of people into one category. Cromer clearly is the epitome of what it is to be an Orientalist since he obviously agrees with what Said means by Orientalism.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Human Heart Essay

The human heart is by far one of the most vital organs of the body. It has a mass that ranges from 250 grams to 350 grams. Its contraction and expansion results in 2000 gallons of blood being pumped through the body’s blood vessels per day. It’s located in the middle of the chest protected by the ribcage. Its building blocks are a unique type of muscle known as the myocardium, and it’s enclosed by a double-walled membranous sac known as the pericardium. The double-walled membrane houses the pericardial fluid which cushions the heart preventing shock and nourishing it. It’s divided into four chambers and has a large network of arteries and veins. The chambers are known as the atrium and ventricles. A special kind of muscle called the septum divides the right cavity and the left cavity. Normally the expulsion of blood from one cavity would result in a subsequent amount of blood flowing into the adjacent cavity. The left ventricle is the strongest and largest chamber since its tasked with pumping blood to all parts of the body through the aorta. The right cavity of the heart which is composed of the right atria and right ventricle receives deoxygenated blood from all parts of the body and pumps this blood to the lungs for oxygenation (pulmonary circulation). The left cavity composed of the left atria and left ventricle receives the oxygenated blood from the lungs and pumps this blood to all body parts through the aorta (systemic circulation). The heart has four valves that regulate the flow of blood through its chambers. Blood flow from the right atrium to the right ventricle is regulated by the tricuspid valve. The pulmonary valve regulates blood flowing into the pulmonary artery from the right ventricle. Oxygenated blood from the lungs passes through the mitral valve situated between the left atrium and left ventricle. The aortic valve regulates oxygenated blood flow from the left ventricle to the aorta for delivery to the body. One of the greatest threats to the hearts proper functioning and subsequently to a person’s survival is a heart attack. A heart attack occurs when the heart is not able to pump blood effectively due to arteries clogging. Deposition of fatty cells in arteries will lead to their constriction inhibiting the flow of blood leading to a heart attack which is fatal in most cases.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Is Marxism Still Relevant Today?

The Industrial Revolution (1750-1850) had brought about significant changes in agriculture, mining, manufacturing, transportation and technology and subsequently established an era of unprecedented economic growth in capitalist economies. It was within this era that Karl Marx had observed the deprivation and inequality experienced by men of the proletariat, the working class, who had laboured excessively for hours under inhumane conditions to earn a minimum wage while the bourgeoisie, the capitalist class, reaped the benefits.For Marx it was this fundamental inequality within the social and economic hierarchy that had enabled capitalist societies to function. While Marx’s theories, in many instances have been falsified and predictions invalid, his ideas about class struggle and conflict being a motivator for change is still relevant in contemporary society. The disparity of wealth between occupations in Australia demonstrates that class stratification is still inherent within society and the recent Qantas airline dispute is a relevant example of this.Marx’s theory of class struggle originates with his belief that â€Å"the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles† (Marx & Engel, 1848). Marx had established that conflict between classes was the key driving force of history and the main determinant of social change. For Marx, conflict originates with the deterioration of a ‘false consciousness’ and the subsequent acquisition of a unified ‘class consciousness’.Marx argued that that proletariat was under the influence of a ‘false consciousness’ brought about with the acceptance of the dominant ideology that freedom and equality could be interpreted as an equal exchange of labour for wages (van Krieken et al. , 2010). Marx however, perceived this as an exploitive relationship because in capitalism, the labourer only receives what is deemed sufficient to meet his basic needs for himself and his family, as opposed to the real value of his labour power.Marx had identified that the difference between the labourer’s wage and the value of the goods in which he produces is taken as profit, of which only the capitalist is the beneficiary (Habibis & Walter, 2009). Marx had theorised that, as a result of this exploitive relationship, alienation would occur. Marx argued that commodification of goods and services produced in conjunction with the lack of control over the end result would mean that workers would no longer recognise a connection with their labour, and hence become alienated from their labour.Only with the recognition of class exploitation and alienation would a class consciousness develop. Marx referred to class consciousness as a ‘class for itself’, denoting a collective self-awareness of the interests shared by members of a social group (van Krieken et al. , 2010). Marx predicted that class consciousness would create a conflict of interest between classes and revolution would eventuate. The bourgeoisie would be overthrown, capitalism would collapse and a classless state would emerge as its successor (van Krieken et al. , 2010). In post-modern times however, it is widely accepted that the opposite occurred.Critics insist that Marxism’s credibility was eradicated with the fall of the communist states within the ‘Eastern Bloc’. While others such as China, although still governed by a communist party, have adopted numerous capitalist policies (van Krieken et al. , 2010). Marxism has also been criticised for its over-concentration on economic relationships and its tendency to overlook other forms of non-economic conflicts (Griffith, 2005). Feminists, for example, argue that the conflicts between male and female relations are not necessarily related to economics, but patriarchal.Furthermore, Marx like other social theorists at the time had ignored the role and contribution of women. Marx had described the proletariat of industrial societies where manual labour was involved; he did not however, take into consideration a woman’s domestic or reproductive labour. Federici (2004) asserts that Marx failed to recognise the importance of reproductive labour because he had adopted the capitalist criteria for what constitutes labour and believed that a wage in exchange for labour would be the paradigm that shapes humanity. Considering that as of 2010, 45. % of the Australian labour force comprised of women it would seem that Marx’s socialist perspective is less so equal or relevant in contemporary society. Marxism is often cited as being irrelevant within contemporary society due to the fact that Marx had critiqued an almost incomparable society. McDonald & Brownlee (2001) argue that contemporary society exists in a post-modern era where westernised societies enjoy the benefits of higher living standards, where the rights of employees are elicited within the Austra lian Constitution and the rights of humans are dictated within Geneva conventions.An era where employees are entitled to government pensions, allowances, superannuation, and employees accrue sick and annual leave (McDonald & Brownlee, 2001). Furthermore employees are able to seek union representation and are legally entitled to industrial action. McDonald and Brownlee (2001) assert that Fair Work Australia, established as an institution responsible for fixating minimum wage and resolving work related disputes, perpetuates the notion that Australia is in transition to become an egalitarian society with minimal class disparity.Critics have also argued that Marxism within western society is no longer relevant due to the increased levels of social mobility. Social mobility refers to movement in an individual’s or group’s social position over time and is often assessed on their change in income over time (Borgatta & Montogomery, 2000). The traditional stratification of clas ses had a tendency to overlook the middle class and analyse the two extremes of rich and poor, bourgeoisie and proletariat (van Krieken et al. 2010). In the context of Marxism, the middle class was ignored due to their perceived limited role within the political revolution that would depose of capitalism. In contemporary society however, the traditional labouring occupations have decreased, leading to a shortage of skilled labourers and tradesman. As a result these occupations often earn a higher income, blurring the line between working class and middle class (Braverman, 1974).In August 2011 the most common occupations were distinctly white collar with the workforce comprising of 22% professionals, 15% Clerical and administrative workers and 14% Technicians and trades workers (Australian Bureau Statistics, 2011). The evident emergence of the white collar-middle class within contemporary society significantly undermines Marx’s theory of class stratification who had predicted an absorption into the working class and the emergence of a classless state. Despite this however, research has suggested that social mobility has not necessarily increased.Graetz and McAllister (1994) identified that while the shift between manual and non-manual occupations has increased since the 1970’s, most of this has been the result of structural changes in light of technological innovations and advancements in modern society, as opposed to mobility in social classes. Moreover, Leigh (2007) argues that the youth of Australia are equally likely to reproduce, or not reproduce, the class of their parents and that social mobility in the context of Australian youth, has not necessarily increased.Argy (2005) reinforces this argument and states that while Australia can be referred to as economically liberated country, there has not necessarily been an increase in equal opportunity and the distribution of wealth within Australia is an evident example of this. The National Centr e for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM) was commissioned to conduct a study in relation to the distribution of wealth in Australia. NATSEM analyst Simon Kelly (2002) reported that the richest fifth of households in Australia each have, on average, forty times more wealth than the poorest fifth of the population.The NATSEM data reiterates that wealth within Australia is still concentrated in the hands of the wealthy minority who have ascertained the benefits of the economic growth in recent years by disproportionately increasing their personal wealth (Stillwell & Primrose, 2011). The disparity of wealth between occupations was a key indicator of the inequality between classes. NATSEM data identified that personal wealth is the highest for managers and administrators (men $250,000, women $183,300) and professionals (men $173,800, women $99,700).In contrast to these figures, the lowest personal wealth is held by the production and transport workers ($55,400), labourers (men 39,700 , women $29,300) and trade persons (men 60,000, women 35,000) (Stillwell & Primrose, 2011). From a sociological perspective class inequality is often represented by comparing class personal wealth and income. From a Marxism perspective however, a person’s social class isn’t defined by personal wealth but rather the level of control that a person wields over the means of production.According to Ben Hillier (2012) it is measured in terms of social wealth derived from the â€Å"control of the productive or financial apparatus of society†. This can be interpreted as the bourgeoisie having ownership of the assets that enable modern society to function such as the telecommunications infrastructure, electrical companies, newspaper enterprises, transport facilities and mines etc. The transactional influence of these assets inevitably provides its owner with the power to influence governments of capitalist societies and effects how society functions.The recent Qantas air ways dispute demonstrated how this power is exercised. One recent example of class conflict inherent within Australian society was the Qantas airways dispute. On 29th October 2011, Qantas CEO Alan Joyce issued a press release announcing the immediate grounding and cancellation of all Australian domestic and international flights and the lock-out of all employees without pay. Leading up to the unprecedented grounding, Qantas had been involved in contract negotiations with unions representing employees of the company.The unions were seeking a 3-5% wage increase and better job security for casual staff. (Mulcahy, 2011). Around the same time Qantas had announced its decision to slash 1000 jobs and restructure its fleet to move to Asia under a new airline Jetstar Japan. The traditional international routes within the North Atlantic were operating at a loss with a half year profit of $241 million a year ago, dropping by 83%, to $42 million (Ryan, 2012). Despite the evident decline in prof it the airlines had awarded Alan Joyce with a 71% lift in his total remuneration package to $5. 1 million, after he received $2. million worth of shares (Mulcahy, 2011). After two days the debacle finally ended with the intervention of the Federal government submitting an application to Fair Work Australia (FWA), terminating the industrial dispute and ordering Qantas to resume operations. The verdict stated that those involved had 21 days to finalise a settlement to the dispute and neither party could engage in further action for three years after a settlement had been made. If an agreement could not be reached the Fair Work industrial courts would arbitrate the details of the contracts (Mulcahy, 2011).The economic impact was expected to be profound, Qantas which represents approximately 65% of the aviation industry, contributes $6 billion to the Australian economy and employs 50,000 employees (Squires, 2011). Although Qantas reports that the dispute cost them $120 million, its shar e prices increased by 6% to $1. 61 (Frith, 2011). The controversy attracted much political and economic commentary speculating on who won the dispute and what this would mean for those involved. Alan Joyce explicitly stated that the FWA ruling was a favourable decision for Qantas as â€Å"nobody any more can take industrial action† (Taylor, 2011).This thereby would allow Qantas to restructure its fleet in Asia, ascertaining cheaper wages by outsourcing and offshoring labour, without any internal opposition. The unions established to represent the working class of businesses and corporations would be made obsolete for three years allowing any injustices within the workplace to remain unresolved. From a Marxist perspective this would mean that the bourgeoisie of the company, the CEO and high profile managers, who already have exceeding high salaries, would profit from the new means of production and the proletariat would be further disadvantaged with pay cuts and the isk of red undancy. Karl Marx’s critique of industrial societies developed out of the belief that conflict between stratified classes such as the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, would be the drive needed to perpetuate social change. Marx believed that with the acquisition of a class consciousness the proletariat would revolt against the exploitative capitalist institution, eradicating all class structures and establishing a socialist state. Admittedly, Marx’s critique failed to recognise essential components of society such as the middle class and female representation which has significantly undermined Marx’s theory of class struggle.Furthermore Marx’s predictions have been falsified in light of modern developments which have led to many critics casting doubt on its relevance within contemporary society. The higher living standards, government allowances and union representation enjoyed by citizens within Australia all perpetuate notions of equality and repudiate the potential collapse of capitalism. Despite this however, there are still many instances of class inequality inherent in Australian society.The disparity of wealth between occupations in Australia demonstrates that the minority with extreme wealth have control over the means of production, and have used the power derived from it to influence society’s development. The recent Qantas dispute is a testament of how this power is exercised and demonstrates how the wealthy minority are able to accumulate excess wealth at the expense of the labouring class. Thus attesting to the inherent class inequality that Marx had recognised, and acknowledging its existence within contemporary Australian society. ?